In India the power of judical review is restricted because

examrobotsa's picture
(IES/)
In India the power of judical review is restricted because

question_subject: 

Polity

question_exam: 

IES

stats: 

0,35,6,2,3,35,1

keywords: 

{'judical review': [1, 0, 0, 0], 'judges': [2, 0, 1, 2], 'constitution': [39, 3, 11, 39], 'legislature': [3, 0, 1, 3], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13], 'power': [24, 3, 21, 61], 'executive': [1, 0, 0, 1]}

The correct answer is option 3 - The Constitution is supreme.

In India, the power of judicial review is restricted because the Constitution is considered to be the supreme law of the land. Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and determine the constitutionality of laws and government actions. It ensures that the actions of the executive and legislative branches of government are in line with the provisions of the Constitution.

Option 1 - The executive is supreme: This option is incorrect because in a democratic system, no branch of the government is considered supreme. Each branch, including the executive, has powers and limitations defined by the Constitution.

Option 2 - The Legislature is supreme: This option is incorrect because while the legislature has the power to make laws, it is subject to the provisions of the Constitution. The courts have the authority to review and strike down any laws that are found to be unconstitutional.

Option 4 - The Judges are transferable: This option is not relevant to the restriction on the power of judicial review. The transferability of judges does not directly impact their ability to review laws and government actions for constitutionality.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 3 - The Constitution is supreme. This means that the courts in India have the authority to review and invalidate any laws