Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a fundamental right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such ?

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: 110 (CDS-II/2013)
Which of the following freedoms is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India as a fundamental right but has been subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as such ?

question_subject: 

Polity

question_exam: 

CDS-II

stats: 

0,118,34,19,10,5,118

keywords: 

{'freedoms': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'freedom': [1, 1, 2, 2], 'fundamental right': [9, 0, 2, 4], 'constitution': [39, 3, 11, 39], 'supreme court': [12, 1, 4, 14], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13]}

Option 1: Freedom of trade, occupation, and business

Freedom of trade, occupation, and business is mentioned as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. This right allows citizens to engage in any lawful trade or business of their choice.

Option 2: Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the country

Freedom to reside and settle in any part of the country is also mentioned as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(e) of the Constitution of India. This right allows citizens to move freely within the territory of India and choose their place of residence.

Option 3: Freedom of association and union

Freedom of association and union is explicitly mentioned as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India. This right allows citizens to form associations or unions and peacefully assemble for any lawful purpose.

Option 4: Freedom of the press

The correct answer is 4. Freedom of the press is not specifically mentioned as a fundamental right in the Constitution of India. However, the Supreme Court of India has upheld it as a part of the freedom of speech and expression, which is guaranteed as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The