According to the Constitution of India, there are specific criteria for the appointment of a Judge to the Supreme Court. Option 1 states that an advocate who has practiced for at least ten years in any court can be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court. This is incorrect because it does not align with the constitutional provisions.

Option 2 suggests that a Judge of a High Court for at least three years can be appointed. While High Court judges may be considered for appointment to the Supreme Court, this option does not cover other eligible candidates.

Option 4 states that a person who has held a judicial office for at least fifteen years can be appointed. Although this criterion is relevant, it does not cover all possible candidates.

The correct answer, option 3, states that a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President of India can be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court. This option aligns with Article 124 of the Indian Constitution, which provides for the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court. The President has the authority to consult with judges and legal experts to determine the eligibility of a candidate. Therefore, option 3 reflects the correct criteria for the appointment of a Judge to the Supreme Court.