Option 1 states that the right conferred by Article 32 cannot be suspended except by virtue of Article 359(1) of the Constitution of India. This statement is correct. Article 32 guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights, and this right can only be suspended under certain circumstances as defined in Article 359(1).

Option 2 states that the enforcement of Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended. This statement is correct. Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India provide protection against double jeopardy and violation of personal liberty respectively, and these fundamental rights cannot be suspended.

Option 3 states that punishments can be prescribed by a State legislation for offences under Part III of the Constitution of India. This statement is incorrect. Part III of the Constitution of India deals with fundamental rights, and punishments for offences against these fundamental rights are prescribed by the central legislation rather than the state legislation.

Option 4 states that the Fundamental Rights can be abrogated by law made by the Parliament with regard to members of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order. This statement is correct. The Parliament has the power to abrogate or limit the Fundamental Rights of members of the armed forces, paramilitary forces, and police personnel involved in