Q: (SSC/0)
question_subject:
Polity
question_exam:
SSC
stats:
0,43,4,43,0,3,1
keywords:
{'fundamental rights': [13, 0, 7, 20], 'punjab': [2, 0, 1, 0], 'golakhnath': [1, 0, 0, 0], 'krishna': [0, 0, 0, 3], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13], 'west bengal': [1, 0, 0, 3], 'sharma': [1, 0, 0, 1], 'bombay': [0, 0, 1, 0], 'union': [17, 3, 24, 36], 'case': [6, 0, 1, 6]}
The case related to Fundamental Rights is Golakhnath vs. State of Punjab (1967). This case was significant as it revolved around the interpretation of Article 13 of the Indian Constitution, which deals with the Doctrine of Basic Structure. The Supreme Court in this case declared that Parliament does not have the power to amend fundamental rights as they are considered to be part of the basic structure of the Constitution. This landmark judgment implied that fundamental rights are protected from being amended or diluted by the legislature. It is important to note that the other options provided are not directly related to fundamental rights. Therefore, option 1 is the correct answer.