Assertion (A) >: An award made by a Lok Adalat is deemed to be a decree of a Civil Court. Reason (R) >: Award of Lok Adalat is final and binding on all parties, and no appeal lies against thereto before any court.

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: 76 (CDS-II/2007)

Assertion (A): An award made by a Lok Adalat is deemed to be a decree of a Civil Court.
Reason (R): Award of Lok Adalat is final and binding on all parties, and no appeal lies against thereto before any court.

question_subject: 

Polity

question_exam: 

CDS-II

stats: 

0,49,34,49,21,11,2

keywords: 

{'lok adalat': [1, 0, 2, 0], 'civil court': [1, 0, 3, 1], 'appeal': [2, 0, 3, 1], 'court': [11, 1, 18, 32], 'award': [0, 0, 6, 9], 'decree': [2, 0, 2, 0]}

Option 1 states that both the assertion (A) and the reason (R) are individually true, and furthermore, R provides the correct explanation for A.

The assertion (A) states that an award made by a Lok Adalat is deemed to be a decree of a Civil Court. This means that the decision made by a Lok Adalat is considered to be legally binding like a decree issued by a Civil Court.

The reason (R) states that the award of a Lok Adalat is final and binding on all parties, and no appeal lies against it before any court. This means that once the decision is made by a Lok Adalat, it cannot be appealed or challenged in any other court.

Option 1 suggests that R explains why A is true. Since the award is final and binding with no provision for appeal, it can be equated to a decree of a Civil Court. Therefore, Option 1 concludes that both A and R are true, and R gives the correct explanation for A.

In this case, the given answer is generally correct, and there is no need for an alert.