Which one among the following statements regarding Satavahanas is not correct ?

examrobotsa's picture
Q: 109 (CAPF/2011)

Which one among the following statements regarding Satavahanas is not correct ?

question_subject: 

History

question_exam: 

CAPF

stats: 

0,63,69,17,27,25,63

keywords: 

{'satavahanas': [0, 1, 0, 2], 'vasishthiputra satakarni': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'brahmana descent': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'puranas': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'brahmanical vedic tradition': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'andhras': [0, 0, 1, 1], 'shakas': [1, 2, 0, 1]}

The Satavahanas were a dynasty that ruled in South India and the Deccan region from the 1st century BCE to the 3rd century CE. They are generally identified with the Andhras of the Puranas, so option 1 is correct.

Option 2 states that the Satavahanas claimed Brahmana descent and followed Brahmanical Vedic tradition. This is also true, as there is evidence of their association with Brahminical rituals and practices.

Option 3 states that the Satavahanas and Shakas were involved in prolonged conflict. This is true as well, as there are historical records and inscriptions that mention conflicts between the Satavahanas and Shakas.

Option 4, which states that Vasishthiputra Satakarni defeated Shaka ruler Rudradaman I, is not correct. The defeat of Rudradaman I is attributed to another ruler named Gautamiputra Satakarni, not Vasishthiputra Satakarni. Therefore, option 4 is the correct answer.

In summary, the Satavahanas were identified with the Andhras, claimed Brahmana descent, had conflicts with the Shakas, but Vasishthiputra Satakarni did not